Description

My 2 channnel Stereo rig resides in the basement.

Room dimension are 14x19. The speakers are 6 10 " apart setup in an equalateral triangle.

I have the speakers 3.5 feet from the front and back walls (back wall distance varies depending on where I place my listening chair)

The imaging is solid now I'm currently working on improving overall depth and soundstaging

The room acoustics in this room are quite complicated The room is a difficult layout with lot's of restrictions. GIK Acoustics room treatments have helped to even out the room nodes

but there is still quite a bit of tinkering left

Ideas/suggestions how to further improve the existing layout and performance is welcome !

Thanks for stopping by
Read more...

Components Toggle details

    • Dodd Audio 120 Monoblocks
    120 Watt el34 Push Pull Design Upgraded with Chrome Finish
    • Ridge Street Sason LTD
    Musical epiphany right here
    • Exemplar Audio 2900
    Upgraded Siltech Wiring
    • Reality Cables Custom Shotgun
    Bi Wired Config
    • KCI silkWorms 1 metre
    Interconnects Amp to Pre pre to cdp
    • Lenco L-75 Jean Nantais with Upgrades
    Lenco L-75 in a Wooden Plinth with Audiomods Arm and Ortofon 2m Bronze Paul Hynes Phono stage

Comments 115

Showing all comments by blindjim.

View all comments

Pat
I'd say it may be more like 'which' sort of chocolate or vanilla, rather than one with more contrast such as 'either', 'or'. Like Swiss Almond Vanilla, or Vanilla praline. Chocolate choclate chip, or Chocolate rocky road. One being richer, the other perhaps with better popularity.

Me and vinyl are not the best of friends. I've nearly 300 LPs in my closet I've not played in 30+years... and then only one side of some.

I fear the expense, and my inability to handle them properly as well as demo them without defacing them is going to preclude my involvement in that part of the hobby.

To my benefit then, ignorance is bliss. I should then sell these things I suppose.... or find an automatic TT which can handle them well, and produce solidly good sounds and that doesn't need it's own preamp. Being hard of seeing isn't advantageous with LPs, needles, tone arms, etc.
.

blindjim


Ya know… I’ve been asking myself that question for a month or so now and that’s about how long it’s been since I listened to the Dodd MK IIs. Easy. Perhaps longer.

There is a decided difference. The 5150 acts completely different in 2ch mode, as it has more of the power supply to draw upon, without having to supply the other 3 ch. According to Butler, it’s pumping out over 200 wpc @ 8, that way.

Think SS power speed, and control, with a hint of tube influence. Sufficient influence to be detectable for sure. It's too bad one can not roll the tubes within the Butler amps. But better or rather more solid imagery results, with more of the image itself, being revealed. There’s no comparison as to the better bass the 5150 yields either… hands down it’s the 5150. it wins that war outright.

By comparison and perhaps in truth, though no comparison of different topologies is really fair, the Dodd MK IIs produce the better harmonics. More colorful, richer, and with better low level detail. The MK IIs also formulate a sound stage closer to the LP, rather than rearward of the speakers plane as do the Butlers, so the room filling aspect is superior with the EL 34 amps.

Both amps, in their own rights are very very enjoyable, no question about that. I guess it's a matter of prefference. Luckily, I took the chance with the 5150 for another intention and discoverd this added benefit, and welcomed change of pace listening experience coincidentally.

I’ll be returning the 5150 to solely HT duties soon enough. However it holds up very well in it’s own account with music too, as I sat listening last night through the Onkyo rec + BC DAC3 + 5150 + Sonata IIIs for hours and hours and hours… from around 6pm untill about 230am. File after file flew by, so I’ve gotta say music too ain’t bad with the Butler.

Add in a better pre like my Thor, and things get tuffer to choose between which amp (s) are better. For now, neither amp is going anywhere.

It’s shown me one thing for sure… the IIIs do indeed enjoy a fair amount of power and why I mentioned the newest Dodd venture into a hybrid amp, with tubes you can roll, class A biasing, and 300wpc @ 8. Although he uses MOSFETS instead of bipolar as output devices. The Butlers use Sanken bipolars. Something to think about anyways.

Glad your TT enterprise is proving out a great adventure.

blindjim

A flat TV vs a box should help. using a cloth of sorts, linen, thin blanket, etc over the screen when in 2 ch will help too. of course if it's not a huge screen it might not be worth the effort.

Seen the new hybrid Gary's making? 300w - 600w @4ohms. One tube per amp, one per ch! Biased class A. 5687s I think. I got a Butler hybrid recently and have been impressed. they don't claim the Dodd numbers though falling shorter at 200+ in 2ch mode, and 150w in 5ch mode.

Glad to see your rig is gainnig you more happiness lately too. Good.

how is the TT coming along? Like it?

blindjim

Very nice rig.

Which Sasons are these? I thought I saw another style posted on RSA's web page recently. 'Course, I can't trust my eyes much either.

I'm also curious about the power cords you installed on your Dodds. Good? Great? how?

blindjim